Justin Trudeau; optimism bias?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Photo: CBC News, August 2015.

Risk Management practices for Canadian Infrastructure Funded Projects

To thrive in the world of capital projects, we need a healthy dose of optimism. But there is a downside to optimism; it creates blinds spots. When optimism goes un-checked, it can cloud our critical thinking and allow us to accept unrealistic assumptions and estimates.

Spend it or lose it: March 31, 2018

Here in Canada, the federal government has committed $11.9 billion in their 2016 budget to fund infrastructure investments over the next five years. For Ontario alone, $569M has been approved for water and wastewater rehabilitation, and another $1.4B for public transit infrastructure in phase one of the infrastructure plan. The big constraint? All of the phase one investment must be spent by March 2018.

Impact of Optimism Bias on Construction Projects

Construction Industry Institute (CII) research in this area indicates that projects often suffer from over-optimism, resulting in poor project performance.

The Solution?

Ensuring your organization encourages scrutiny and broad stakeholder engagement in risk management is a proven strategy to address this optimism bias [1]. Effective Risk Management helps address common challenges including [2]:

[list type=”check”]
  • Underestimating the time and cost to complete tasks.
  • Anchoring our expectations to the first estimate provided…even when we know it was developed with limited scope definition.
  • Underestimating the difficulties associated with complex projects.
  • Overestimating a project’s benefits. [/list]

In short, it helps us protect against optimism bias.

The Challenge

Without a doubt, this infrastructure funding brings a tremendous amount of optimism across the Canada, as these projects will deliver long term value to our communities. Everyone wants to see this funding stimulate local economies. We all want these projects completed and funded as planned, but could our optimism bias put us at risk of accepting unrealistic assumptions?

Here are two unique risk areas these infrastructure projects face where scrutiny and broad engagement of stakeholders can help us identify risks to cost and schedule estimates:

1. Renovation and rehabilitation of existing assets. These type of construction projects carry unique construction risks that must be carefully addressed, including:

[list type=”check”]
  • Safety and environmental factors such as zoning, permitting and other regulatory changes brought about by renovation and rehabilitation work.
  • Security and logistics of construction in an operating facility or asset.
  • Completing condition assessments to fully understand existing conditions.
  • Verifying the accuracy of as-built drawings for aging assets.
  • Coordinating with existing operations and other ongoing projects [/list]

2. Skilled labour availability. With so many concurrent projects working to the same completion schedule, availability and securing skilled labour in specific trades will be critical.

Are we getting what we need from Risk Management?

If you are mandated to deliver a strategic project by a required completion date, or at a guaranteed maximum cost, a formal risk management process is one of the best ways to protect your project against optimism bias.

Here are a few questions to ask:

[list type=”check”]
  • Are we achieving broad stakeholder engagement and participation in risk identification and risk assessment?
  • Does our risk management process encourage scrutiny of project assumptions and estimates by all project stakeholders – not just project leaders?
  • Are we using the best techniques to give everyone a voice in risk identification and risk assessment?
  • Are we successful in leveraging lessons learned from similar projects as part of our risk management process? [3] [/list]

How do we follow through to ensure implementation of effective risk responses?

The Solution

Adopting a formal risk management process that is based on best practises from the Construction Industry Institute (CII) is shown to be one of the best ways to reduce optimism bias. Even if formal risk management is relatively new to your organization, you can rapidly take advantage of:

Industry-specific risk identification strategies that encourage broad stakeholder participation, including:

[list type=”check”]
  • The Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI), used during front end planning
  • Structured brainstorming workshops, conducted during each project phase
  • Risk identification checklists, developed specifically for renovation and rehabilitation capital projects. [/list]

2. Configurable risk assessment templates that are purpose-built to support scrutiny of project assumptions and estimates.

3. Proven risk monitoring and reporting tools to help support follow-through and keep projects on budget and on schedule.

If you’re a project leader who is motivated to improve risk management practices, we invite you to join us December 8th in Waterloo, Ontario for a one-day, hands-on workshop.  Our Risk Management Principles & Practices workshop introduces CII’s best practices in risk management, along with the strategies, checklists and tools to add immediate value to your capital projects.

About Valency

Valency is an implementer of best practices in construction project management that dramatically improve project performance. We are a Registered Education Provider with both the Construction Industry Institute (CII) and the Project Management Institute (PMI). Our services include:

[list type=”check”]
  • Training courses accredited by CII and PMI
  • Facilitation of PDRI sessions, risk identification and assessment workshops
  • Implementation consulting and support for CII best practices and tools [/list]

References

[1] Construction Industry Institute, “Four-casting for Early and Accurate Predictability,” Implementation Resource 291-2, 2013.

[2] Bent Flyvbjerg, Massimo Garbuio, and Dan Lovallo, “Delusion and Deception in Large Infrastructure Projects: Two Models for Explaining and Preventing Executive Disaster,” California Management Review, vol. 51, no. 2, Winter 2009.

[3] Construction Industry Institute, “Mega-Project Assessment of Criticality Tool,” Implementation Resource 315-2, 2015.

The following two tabs change content below.

Sandra MacGillivray

Managing Director at Valency Inc.
Sandra is the Managing Director for Valency Inc., an implementer of best practices from the Construction Industry Institute (CII) that dramatically improve capital project performance. She is a Certified PDRI Facilitator, Registered Education Provider (REP) with the Construction Industry Institute (CII), a Project Management Professional (PMP), and a PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) with over 15 years of project management experience. Sandra is a past research team member with the Construction Industry Institute on front end planning, risk management and portfolio management. She holds a Bachelor of Science from the University of Waterloo and a Master in Business Administration from Wilfrid Laurier University.